"We are like eggs at present. And you cannot go on indefinitely being just an ordinary, decent egg. We must hatch or go bad..." - C. S. Lewis
 

Desire: a critical component of choice

fork-in-the-roadThe question of God’s sovereignty and man’s freedom has been tossed around churches ever since early church giants Augustine and Pelagius duked it out back in the 5th century.  Typically the debate has landed on issues concerning man’s role in salvation and election, but not to be left out is the historic doctrine of God’s providence (“protective care and foresight” according to Webster’s).  This biblical theodicy has produced such questions as how can mankind be truly free if God knows the future and has ordained the future, and do people really choose salvation if election is true?

When we start down the road of reconciling these ideas one can either redefine “sovereignty” or “freedom”.  Since there is much more explicitly stated in the Bible to provide an understanding of “sovereign” than “freedom,” I will proceed by examining the latter.  How we understand the concept of “freedom” will shape the way we view the issue.  What does freedom mean?  Does the Bible answer this question for us?  One would be hard pressed to find a proof text to support any detailed system of freedom.  Now to clarify, as an ardent proponent of God’s sovereign providence, I am not afraid of “free will” language.  In fact, I firmly believe all human beings have a free will and make real choices that affect their present lives as well as their eternity.   So what do I mean by freedom?  God has empowered mankind with the ability to choose.  However, when sin entered the human race, the ability to choose righteousness was not lost but the desire was.  In order for any of us to consent to a decision we must have the ability and the desire.  When one of these is absent consent will not happen.  ”Should I fly?”  The desire is present but the ability is lacking.  ”Should I eat earthworms for dinner?”  The ability is present but the desire is lacking.  Now let’s focus on the the second example.  I have the “freedom” or “ability” to eat earthworms for dinner but I lack the desire, and God has created me in a way that unless that desire changes or someone crams them in my mouth, I never will eat them.  This scenario depicts the human condition after the fall; people always have the ability to choose God but they do not desire him.  Peter writes about how Christians have “escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire,” (2 Pet. 1:4).  And Paul encourages the saints in Corinth not to stumble like Israel of old and learn from their example so that they “might not desire evil as they did,” (1 Cor. 10:6).  He also quotes the psalmist to the church at Rome saying, “None is righteous, no, not one; no one understands; no one seeks for God.  All have turned aside…,” (Rom. 3:10-12).  And Isaiah talks about our straying tendency saying, “All we like sheep have gone astray, each one has turned to his own way,” (Isa. 53:6).

Is man free?  Yes.  Every human being who has ever lived has been free to do exactly what they wanted.  God does not force people to salvation against their will.  The beauty of salvation is that God gives us a new will that enables us to choose righteousness.  In the same way, everyone who rejects salvation exercises their ability to choose and demonstrates their true evil desires.  This is certainly not the definitive word on this huge controversy, but I believe the better way forward is to re-examine our idea of freedom rather than redefine God’s sovereignty.  The Bible does speak of a situation where absolute freedom appears to be attained and human ability appears to be lost–the new creation.  We read that in the new heavens and earth we will be in perfect communion with God and no longer will we be able to sin.  If freedom is solely based on ability, eternity is going to be a serious ball and chain.

The Limiting Power of Love (or ‘Is God a Micro-Manager?’)

Is God without limits? I remember discussing the question in college Philosophy class, “if God is omnipotent, can he create a rock so large that he can’t lift it.” It’s a silly question of circular reasoning, but I think it speaks more of our own limitation of understanding God, than of God Himself. We attempt quantify God in terms of physical things that we can understand. Space and time, logic and reason, gender and roles. But I believe that God has created a rock so large that he cannot lift it. Love. I do not believe we fully understand the limiting powers of love.

So what does this have to do with God the micro-manager? I know many people who believe that because God is sovereign, he must control everything. Like some elaborate puppet master, each action and thought, every event in history is performed only by his will alone. I know there are plenty of verses in the Scriptures to support this claim, notably Isaiah. But I also believe there is much in support of a God that allows men to think for themselves, act on their own will and even change God’s mind. Here are a few:

2 Peter 3:9 “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.
Peter writing to the church, addressing the perceived delay in God’s judgment, explains that God’s time doesn’t work like our time, and that He is being patient, not wanting anyone to perish but all to repent. If God relies solely on His own election, and man has no free will, then this is a lie. If He desires that all repent, and all do not, God is either powerless or a liar.

Genesis 6:5-6 “The Lord saw how great man’s wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. The Lord was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain.
The story of Noah begins with this confession from God “I am grieved that I have made [mankind].” If God was a micro-manager, then how could man’s actions grieve Him?

Jonah 3:10 “When God saw what they did and how they turned from their evil ways, he had compassion and did not bring upon them the destruction he had threatened.
Why would God threaten destruction for evil ways that he had caused the Ninevites to perpetrate, only to change their ways and then withdraw the threat of judgment. Unless Nineveh had the potential to change their own ways, this action is meaningless.

Job.
In the book of Job, God points out Job to Satan as a shining example of a servant. To which, Satan responds “Of course he is, you have blessed him tremendously.” Notice Satan doesn’t say “of course he is, you control his brain”. Why would God point out Job’s nature, if Job had no authority to control his own actions. Why play through the charade, allowing Satan to ravage him, to test his character, if his character was solely a gesture sparked only by God’s volition?

I think each of these examples points to the limiting nature of God’s love for us.

When my first child was born, I remember how stifled I suddenly felt. It seemed like my life as I knew it was over. I couldn’t sleep in anymore (or even through the night for that matter). My actions were forever altered by the fact that I was now responsible for another life. I think this is not unlike the limiting power of God’s love for us. It doesn’t mean God is not sovereign, it means that His love allows him to shelve His sovereignty so that our choice to honor Him would be genuine. That our reciprocating love would be real.